Thursday, June 23, 2011

Ken Wilber, Integral and Jung

http://www.betruelove.com - Recently in the Ken Wilber meetup group we talked about Jung and Ken Wilber. There are two paths to enlightenment, either transcend it all by saying, I am "not this, not this." - the "male" way. The "female" way is to embody all. Ken Wilber calls this Freedom vs. Fullness.

At integral (see Don Beck and Ken Wilber), perhaps we do both.  In dreams, with psychedelics, via meditation - perhaps we can experience archetypes on the way up or down the path from spirit to form.

Western religion seeks ONLY to transcend and this can give us the idea of sin, denial of shadow, rejection of the body, and formless seen as better than form.

My video shows the paths and the role of archetypes. These could be seen in our regular behavior, but also via meditation or shamanic journeys.

This begs the question, are we generating  them? Or are they generating us? Or are they being discovered or revealed? Is Neo in the Matrix a retelling of the Jesus archetype? Is the main character in "Source Code" a new vision of God as Man and Man as God?




Tuesday, June 21, 2011

When will the spiritual path make me happier?

Many spiritual seekers get embrace the path because the want to stop feeling badly - or to feel better. Because turning on the lights in a room reveals all the dirt - the path can increase one's suffering. But what happens if we stop trying to manage the moods. What if "good," "bad," "profane," and "holy" are seen to be just thoughts? They lose their power when you stop judging them constantly. If there is energy in the body associated with a thought or feeling, it's simply allowed to be.

Compassion literally means “feeling with.” How can you feel compassion until you are willing to feel what you feel? If it's sad, mad, glad or bad - what if we just feel it, open to it. Then we feel (if we don't contract or aim to condemn the thought) a raw tenderness. this is a willingness to be vulnerable, and for those who stake their identity to be on a spiritual path, very humbling. 

If we’ve been on a spiritual path for years, we feel we should not be feeling these fears, anxiety, anger, sorrow or helplessness. When we are able to acknowledge these feelings and surrender fully to them, we’re open to the full range of experiences of being a human.

This is not indulging or wallowing because it's not about the stories in the mind. In becoming open, accepting and present, we access without judgment the feeling - not our feelings about the feeling. We don't get stuck on an identity like “poor me,” - we relate directly to the feeling sadness beyond story. 

It is actually being willing to meet, include, welcome, allow, open to, and even surrender to whatever feeling or thought that is being experienced. It takes bravery to acknowledge, feel, and open to what your mind feels it needs to be happy. Inside of that, you find causeless joy. We open to the conditions the mind believes must be needed to love ourselves or others, and inside of that, we find unconditional love. Indulgence means fixating on the need and being run by it - but this is not about needing to act - this is merely to see.

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Do you feel the need to protect your self-esteem, gain respect, or defend yourself?

In life we often feel compelled to defend ourselves. If not ourselves, we may need to defend another person, a belief, or a cause. This can lead us to be attached to an image of ourselves, and a need to maintain that image. This can all happen without us realizing its an image, and not who we truly are. But what is the purpose of that image? I would suggest that all the self-images the mind generates are intended to bring love in the form of affection, respect, power, independence, control or belonging.

If we think affection, respect, power, independence, control or belonging are the same as love (they aren't), we become attached to the image that promises to deliver them. We completely forget that we are the awareness beneath it. Even if we are successful in our self-defense, even if the other person respects us, pays us back, shows gratitude, or expresses affection, all we have done is reinforce the illusory story. All our actions, if they come from the belief that love is conditional and comes from acting (or resisting acting), will be used to create, maintain, and defend an illusory image. If our efforts succeed in bolstering this image - our avatar - then we have gained nothing.

On the other hand if we act from love, see our minds as our lovesick child, then we don't need to make ourselves, or the other person, wrong. We can celebrate ourselves and others. We can feel compassion for our mind (and the mind of the other) as it seeks respect, repayment, gratitude, or affection. From this loving place our actions won't driven by a need to reinforce our illusory image, and thus won't perpetuate the illusory story.

But how to get there? Often we feel we need others to act a certain way. Maybe we want respect or appreciation. We know there are actions we can take to increase our self esteem. We judge events to see if it increases or decreases that self-image. It's a gift when you spot the mind flipping between good news to bad news. For example, you hold the door open for someone and you feel like you are (or seeking confirmation that you are) a kind person. Then they pass through the door and you don't get thanked! You suddenly feel disrespected or ignored. The change was so rapid, that we are more apt to ask, “What is it that felt great, then suddenly got crushed?”
It is our image. An image that is apparently quite fragile. It can be tossed like a ship on rough waters. A kind word and it floats, a nasty comment and it sinks. But this serves to highlight the illusion. These determinations are all happening in the mind, and you are not the mind.

The way to catch this is, the moment you see your mind judging yourself, another or a situation ask:
"To whom is this (bad or good) news happening?"
"What conclusion is being drawn about me based on this (bad or good news).
“Who is determining it's good or bad?”
“Who is reacting that conclusion about whom?

You will see that beneath all this judging - nobody is there! You are the non-thing, the pure awareness watching the mind get annoyed, or pleased, by the phenomenon. It's all being interpreted in the mind.

When we stop judging the thoughts, we can see them as merely phenomenon that are arising.

Outside of catching the judging mind in action, the practice is simply this: Constantly ask, "What is happening right now?" and then responding without judgment, "Oh, this is happening."

If a judgment arises, that's what is happening. Then we can use engage the four steps above. As we build the reflex to examine who is making the judgments, and who is the supposed entity that is being judged, we don’t turn that exam into anything. It is simply what is happening. If you feel a sense of relief or pride that you caught the thought rather than being seduced or duped by it, you notice that relief or pride. It's a constant stepping back. No rewards, no punishments, simply a stepping back. We do this over and over every moment. We let that back step move us forward through time. This replaces the customary method of constant evaluation the image and calculating what we need to do to change, defend or reinforce the image. The mind is using that image to find love through objects, but we are providing it love directly so it will no longer have that need.

With this combination of awareness and self-acceptance, we no longer need anything to be different. We may notice sadness and anger arise in the mind and:

- we may see it transmuted into compassion
- or we avoid identification with sadness or anger, but there is no compassion,
- or we may notice we are completely identified.

There need not be any prize or punishment assigned to any of these three; we simply step back from identification by noticing the mind’s activity. We surrender the need for any result. This is why it’s called a practice. Through repetition, the antics of our mind is likely to become a little less heavy, and perhaps even quite amusing.

Monday, June 6, 2011

Inspirational Story of American girl who builds school

Last night I watched (and read) about Maggie Doyne - a 23 year old who set up a school in Nepal and took in 30 orphans on her own. It was very inspirational.

It had me thinking more about what can I give, rather than get. I realized I was operating under a "get-mentality", but as it wasn't about getting material items or prestige, it quietly slipped in under the guise of, "I need an environment, intentional community, or ashram to help me cultivate mindfulness outside the chaos of NYC."

But in that, it was still making the chaos wrong and linking my identity to that chaos - and making my joy dependent on getting myself out of that chaos. In that sense, this is not very different than the desire for money or prestige to "make me better" - just dressed up in holy robes. So, until the day comes where I leave this city, NYC is my teacher.

if you want to be inspired:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/01/maggie-doyne-blinknow-nepal_n_869906.html

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Nature's Nerves - key to reality becoming aware of itself?

I was reading a neuropsychologist on Huffington Post and he talked about how we evolved to look out for danger all the time. He called them "the lies of Mother Nature." This creates an opposition where one is not needed. As an alternativ­e: Can we see the fears, anxieties, worries as our teachers? 


His simple method is seeing "I'm alright right now" - this was something Eckhart Tolle wrote about, "Am I alright now? Not five minutes from now, but this moment?


The neuropsychologist (Rick Hanson) said this isn't a kind of cosmic consciousn­ess, but I think it is! While it may be true that we evolved our desires and aversions to ensure our survival and passing on our genes - could there be a deeper significance? Could this be the key to reality becoming aware of itself?


His instruction is, to see our minds are "functioni­ng fine no matter how nutty and not-fine the contents swirling through it are." - In that very recogntion, I would suggest we are NOT in the mind anymore. We are in the space of Awareness itself. 


The spiritual teacher Mooji says it quite well in this video that I set to wonderful, inspiring music: 
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=X9I4nbPEu­4M

Jordan
www.betrue­love.com